SMHAI Home    About Suicide    About Mental Health    Suicide Prevention    Suicide Survivors    Suicide Attempters    Self-Injury - Cutters    Crisis    Donate    Contact

Mental Health Professionals

Speakers & Presentations

SMHAI Library

Online Support & Resources

Memorials, Remebrances & Celebrations Of Life

Healing Music

Suggested Reading - Survivors

Suggested Reading - Attempters & Self-Injurers

Upcoming Events

Dr. Roerich's Welcome

Ann Gay's Welcome

Legal & About SMHAI

Privacy Policy

Copyright Notice

Awards Honoring SMHAI

SMHAI Awards Program


Search SMHAI:

Shop for everyday items by clicking the below logo. A portion of your purchase supports SMHAI.

SMHAI is listed under the
"Mental Illness" category.

HONcode accreditation seal. We comply with the HONcode standard for health trust worthy information:
verify here.

Federal Court Finds California Assisted-Suicide Law Unconstitutional

A person living with AIDS, joining Dr Jack Kevorkian as a co-plaintiff, has won a declaration that California Penal Code section 401, which makes it a felony for any person to deliberately aid, advise, or encourage another to commit a suicide, violates the Due Process Clause of the US Constitution.[1]

The plaintiff, a 35-year-old person living with AIDS, was first diagnosed as probably HIV-positive in July 1984, before the availability of HIV-antibody testing, was diagnosed with AIDS in 1993, and is now in a terminal state, desiring assistance to commit suicide. Dr Kevorkian is, of course, the well-known "suicide doctor," whose licence to practise medicine in California was suspended in 1994 as a result of his publicized activities along these lines. Marshall J decided that Kevorkian, because he is not presently licensed in California, does not have standing to bring this challenge, and so ruled only on the claim of the person living with AIDS.

Marshall referred to the 9th Circuit's recent decision in Compassion in Dying v State of Washington,[2] in which the court held that the State of Washington's law against assisting suicide was unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause as applied to physician-assisted suicide. Following the reasoning of the 9th Circuit, Marshall found that the California statute violates due process by imposing "undue burden" on terminally ill patients because the statute "does not merely place some restrictions on the right to assisted suicide, but categorically prohibits all such conduct."

Marshall refrained from ruling on the plaintiff's Equal Protection Clause claim, observing that the 9th Circuit had avoided addressing this issue by premising its decision solely on the Due Process Clause. Lacking a California Supreme Court decision on this point, Marshall noted that some California Court of Appeal rulings indicated the unlikelihood that the statute would be found to violate the state constitution.


http://www.aidslaw.ca/Maincontent/otherdocs/Newsletter
/October1996/19KEVORKE.html

Back To The Top

SMHAI Home | About Suicide | About Mental Health | Suicide Prevention | Suicide Survivors
Suicide Attempters | Self-Injury - Cutters | Crisis | Donate | SMHAI Library | Online Support & Resources
Speakers & Presentations | Memorials, Remebrances & Celebrations Of Life | Healing Music
Suggested Reading - Survivors | Suggested Reading - Attempters & Self-Injurers | Mental Health Pros.
Upcoming Events | Dr. Roerich's Welcome | Ann Gay's Welcome | Legal & About SMHAI
Privacy Policy | Copyright Notice | Awards Honoring SMHAI | SMHAI Awards Program | Contact


© SMHAI 2004 - 2006 All Rights Reserved.
No copying or redistribution without expressed written permission of SMHAI.
Logo Design by Allen R. Jacobson.
Site launched July 01, 2004.