|
National Target for Reducing Suicide (UK)
A national target for reducing suicide: important for mental health strategy
as well as for suicide prevention.
By Keith Hawton
Issue: July 18, 1998 British Medical Journal
Important for mental health strategy as well as for suicide prevention
The mental health target in the green paper Our Healthier Nation is "to
reduce the death rate from suicide and undetermined injury by at least a further
sixth (17%) by 2010, from a baseline at 1996."
[1] The former government's Health of the Nation strategy included two
suicide targets--namely, a 15% reduction in the overall suicide rate and a 33%
reduction in the rate in the severely mentally ill.
[2] The initial suicide targets were controversial, argument centring on the
advisability of a target for a relatively uncommon event (about 5000 suicides
and open verdicts each year in England and Wales), the difficulty of predicting
suicide, and the pressure the targets might place on psychiatric services.
Nevertheless, the overall suicide rate has declined since the original
targets were set. Most importantly, the previous rapid rise in suicides in men
aged 15-44 years has started to reverse.
[1] Why do we still need a suicide target and can suicide rates be reduced
further?
Suicide is usually the tragic end point of various possible pathways,
influenced by mental ill health and psychological, socioeconomic, familial,
interpersonal, and genetic factors. Media influence and the availability of
means of suicide also seem to be important.
[3] These pathways embrace many factors relevant to mental health in general,
and a suicide target is therefore a valuable peg for a range of mental health
strategies. Suicide prevention is not, however, solely the concern of mental
health services. Some two thirds of all people who commit suicide have not
received specialist psychiatric care in the year before death.
[4] A focus on suicide is directly relevant to mental health strategy in
primary care, especially improved detection and treatment of depression, even if
general practitioners rarely experience suicide in one of their patients.
Moreover, it is directly relevant to social health and economic policy.
Lastly, it is a solid target that will keep mental health in the forefront of
planning about health care and prevention of ill health. The difficulty of
measuring the third Health of the Nation mental health target--namely,
improvement in the health and social functioning of the mentally ill (and indeed
the second suicide target[2])--should warn against having another target that
lacks hard longitudinal data.
While a target related to effective detection and treatment of depression
might seem ideal, given the incidence of depression and its consequent
disability, it is difficult to imagine what this might be. An unmeasurable
target could harm mental health strategy.
If the suicide target is retained in the forthcoming white paper how might it
be achieved? Pinpointing factors that have contributed to the recent decline in
the suicide rate is not easy. Nevertheless, the management of patients with
psychiatric disorders has improved in terms of clinicians maintaining continuity
of care through the care planning approach and in the development of more
effective medication for schizophrenia and safer antidepressants.
The presence of a suicide target has certainly helped keep risk assessment at
the forefront of clinicians' minds. One way of refining prevention efforts would
be to target specific groups of individuals at risk.
Three immediately come to mind. Firstly, the rate of suicide in young men is
nearly double what it was 10-15 years ago. Creative strategic planning is
necessary to tackle the anomie and substance abuse that afflict many young men
today, especially in socio-economically deprived groups.
Secondly, patients who deliberately harm themselves have a risk of suicide
some 100 times that of the general population,[5] and 20-25% of people who die
by suicide have presented to a general hospital after episodes of self harm in
the year before death.[4]
Yet despite the availability of guidelines,[6] the quality of general
hospital psychiatric services for these patients remains variable and often
inadequate.[7] When many people who will commit suicide are presenting to
clinical services this must be a focus for improvement, even if demonstrating
effectiveness in terms of suicide prevention is difficult.[3]
The third group comprises patients with mental illness: virtually every
psychiatric disorder carries a raised risk of suicide. Further developments in
mental health services must, however, be introduced in ways that encourage
clinical creativity and competence without adding to the stifling sense of
medicolegal liability that afflicts many clinicians in psychiatry today.
Effective suicide prevention should combine population strategies with those
aimed at high risk groups.[8] Population strategies should include restricting
the availability of means of suicide, since reducing availability does seem to
reduce risk[3]; standards for media reporting and fictional portrayal of
suicides; and, possibly, school programmes for equipping youngsters with
effective problem solving skills and helping staff to detect those at risk of
mental health problems and self harming behaviour.[9]
Finally, while showing the effectiveness of crisis intervention helplines
such as the Samaritans is difficult, the Samaritans should continue to receive
support. Recent efforts to extend the availability of Samaritan befriending to
reach those at risk, including in prisons, rural areas, and via email, deserve
praise.Abandonment of a suicide target at a time when other countries are
establishing suicide prevention programmes[10] would be a backward step, not
only for future potential suicides.
Absence of a clear and measurable mental health target, for which suicide
seems the only realistic candidate, could have negative consequences for overall
mental health strategy and is likely to result in the needs of those with mental
ill health slipping backwards in the league of health priorities.[1]
Secretary of State for Health. Our healthier nation: a contract for health.
London: Stationery Office, 1998.[2] Secretary of State for Health. The health of
the nation: a strategy for health in England London: HMSO, 1992.[3] Gunnell D,
Frankel S. Prevention of suicide: aspirations and evidence. BMJ
1994;308:1227-33.[4] Foster T, Gillespie K, McLelland R. Mental disorders and
suicide in Northern Ireland. Br J Psychiatry 1997;170:447-52.
5] Hawton K, Fagg J. Suicide, and other causes of death, following attempted
suicide. Br J Psychiatry 1988;152:359-66.[6] Royal College of Psychiatrists The
general hospital management of adult deliberate self-harm. London: Royal College
of Psychiatrists, 1994.[7] Hughes T, Hampshaw S, Renvoize E, Storer D. General
hospital services for those who carry out deliberate self-harm. Psychiatr Bull
1998;22:88-91.[8] Lewis G, Hawton K, Jones P. Strategies for preventing suicide.
Br J Psychiatry 1997;171:351-4.[9] Shaffer D. Implications for education:
prevention of youth suicide. In: Jenkins R, Griffiths S, Wylie I, Hawton K,
Morgan G, Tylee A, eds. The prevention of suicide. London: HMSO,
1994:163-73.[10] Taylor S, Kingdom D, Jenkins R. How are nations trying to
prevent suicide? An analysis of national suicide prevention strategies. Acta
Psychiatr Scand 1997;95:457-63.Keith Hawton Professor of psychiatryUniversity
Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX
COPYRIGHT 1998 British Medical Association COPYRIGHT 2000 Gale G
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/317/7152/156


Back To The Top
SMHAI Home |
About Suicide |
About Mental Health |
Suicide Prevention |
Suicide Survivors
Suicide Attempters |
Self-Injury - Cutters |
Crisis |
Donate |
SMHAI Library |
Online Support & Resources
Speakers & Presentations |
Memorials, Remebrances & Celebrations Of Life |
Healing Music
Suggested Reading - Survivors |
Suggested Reading - Attempters & Self-Injurers |
Mental Health Pros.
Upcoming Events |
Dr. Roerich's Welcome |
Ann Gay's Welcome |
Legal & About SMHAI
Privacy Policy |
Copyright Notice |
Awards Honoring SMHAI |
SMHAI Awards Program |
Contact
© SMHAI 2004 - 2006 All Rights Reserved. No copying or redistribution without expressed written permission of SMHAI.
Logo Design by Allen R. Jacobson. Site launched July 01, 2004.
|